InvestSMART

Penrice duo pass two-strike spill

THE directors of Penrice Soda have called for the "two-strikes" policy to be revoked, after avoiding going down in history as the first board dumped under the contentious rule.
By · 26 Jan 2013
By ·
26 Jan 2013
comments Comments
THE directors of Penrice Soda have called for the "two-strikes" policy to be revoked, after avoiding going down in history as the first board dumped under the contentious rule.

Chairman David Trebeck and deputy Andrew Fletcher were both re-elected after receiving 78 per cent of the vote at an extraordinary general meeting in Adelaide on Friday.

Both men had already created a bit of unwanted Australian corporate history, with the small Adelaide-based chemicals manufacturer that has a market capitalisation of $10 million thrust into the spotlight for being the first board to be spilled and forced to fight for re-election.

Shareholders rejected the company's remuneration report for the second year in a row in October.

The "two-strikes" rule was designed to deliver shareholders a greater say in the executive remuneration policies of large corporates, particularly as pay packets bulged, often at odds with diminishing shareholder returns.

But after the meeting on Friday, Mr Trebeck said the negative vote against the remuneration report "had more to do with general shareholder disaffection" - the company's poor performance, a declining share price and the absence of dividends - than it did with excessive executive pay.

"Ideally, the two-strikes policy should be terminated," he said, adding that before the two-strikes rule, shareholders who were disgruntled with the performance of the board could still muster enough support to request an extraordinary general meeting and move against some or all directors.

Shareholder advocacy groups and large institutional funds have largely delivered positive feedback on the "two-strikes" regime, and the fact that company directors were now more open to shareholder feedback.

Influential fund manager AMP Capital said earlier this month that it had experienced a "dramatic increase" in companies engaging with it, when previously concerns "fell on deaf ears".

"I'm not convinced," Mr Trebeck said. "I think directors generally are more than capable of identifying and responding to prevailing shareholder sentiment without needing a legislative sledgehammer to do it for them."

He said defending the board spill had been a "massively time- consuming" process.

Penrice has suffered mounting losses and a plummeting share price in recent years, leading to agitation from 5 per cent shareholder London City Equities for board renewal.

Three potential directors put forward by LCE were defeated, each receiving about 25 per cent support.

Penrice recently announced it would cease production of soda ash - an ingredient used in glass-making - and instead import it in a bid to slash costs.

The vote on remuneration reports was previously non-binding, until the two-strikes rule was introduced in 2011. There are concurrent calls from companies and shareholders to simplify executive pay reporting requirements.
Google News
Follow us on Google News
Go to Google News, then click "Follow" button to add us.
Share this article and show your support
Free Membership
Free Membership
InvestSMART
InvestSMART
Keep on reading more articles from InvestSMART. See more articles
Join the conversation
Join the conversation...
There are comments posted so far. Join the conversation, please login or Sign up.

Frequently Asked Questions about this Article…

At an extraordinary general meeting in Adelaide, Penrice Soda chairman David Trebeck and deputy Andrew Fletcher were re-elected after receiving 78% of the vote. The meeting followed a board 'spill' under Australia’s two-strikes rule that forced the directors to stand for re-election.

The two-strikes rule, introduced in 2011, gives shareholders greater say over executive remuneration by creating consequences if remuneration reports attract repeated negative votes. Under the regime a board can be 'spilled' and directors forced to re-contest their positions, increasing shareholder influence over pay and governance.

Penrice chairman David Trebeck argued the negative vote against the remuneration report reflected general shareholder disaffection with the company’s poor performance, falling share price and lack of dividends, not excessive pay. He said directors can identify and respond to shareholder sentiment without a legislative 'sledgehammer' and described defending the board spill as a 'massively time-consuming' process.

Shareholders rejected Penrice’s remuneration report in October for a second consecutive year. According to chairman David Trebeck, the negative votes were driven more by dissatisfaction with company performance, a declining share price and the absence of dividends than by concerns about executive pay.

London City Equities (LCE), a 5% shareholder, agitated for board renewal at Penrice. LCE put forward three potential directors, but each was defeated, receiving about 25% support in the vote.

Yes. Penrice announced it would cease production of soda ash — an ingredient used in glass-making — and instead import the material as part of a bid to slash costs.

Shareholder advocacy groups and large institutional funds have largely given positive feedback on the two-strikes regime, saying it has made company directors more open to shareholder feedback. AMP Capital reported a 'dramatic increase' in companies engaging with its concerns since the rule was introduced.

Based on the Penrice case, investors should monitor company performance indicators cited by shareholders — such as earnings, dividend policy and share price — as well as any board renewal activity, responses to negative remuneration votes, and developments in executive pay reporting or proposed changes to the two-strikes rule.